Here is another write-up on summing percentages. Example 1 is
the only example that produces a valid result. Unless the sum of all the
numerators is being used as the denominator for all the percentages to be
summed it is necessary to calculate group percentages the same way as the
individual percentages are being calculated using the sum of the numerators
divided by the sum of the denominators. There are additional issues
calculating percentages from reports with options to filter the data as then
the calculations need to be based on the filtered data rendering any data
summed in the view useless.
|
|
|
|
Example
1: Using the sum of all the numerators as the denominator for all the
percentages to be summed yields a valid result. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator |
Numerator (Running Total) |
Denominator |
Denominator (Running Total) |
Percentage |
Running Sum of % |
Running Sum of % divided by the
number of percentages summed |
Running Percentage |
1 |
1 |
210 |
210 |
0.48% |
0.48% |
0.48% |
0.48% |
2 |
3 |
210 |
420 |
0.95% |
1.43% |
0.71% |
0.71% |
3 |
6 |
210 |
630 |
1.43% |
2.86% |
0.95% |
0.95% |
4 |
10 |
210 |
840 |
1.90% |
4.76% |
1.19% |
1.19% |
5 |
15 |
210 |
1050 |
2.38% |
7.14% |
1.43% |
1.43% |
6 |
21 |
210 |
1260 |
2.86% |
10.00% |
1.67% |
1.67% |
7 |
28 |
210 |
1470 |
3.33% |
13.33% |
1.90% |
1.90% |
8 |
36 |
210 |
1680 |
3.81% |
17.14% |
2.14% |
2.14% |
9 |
45 |
210 |
1890 |
4.29% |
21.43% |
2.38% |
2.38% |
10 |
55 |
210 |
2100 |
4.76% |
26.19% |
2.62% |
2.62% |
11 |
66 |
210 |
2310 |
5.24% |
31.43% |
2.86% |
2.86% |
12 |
78 |
210 |
2520 |
5.71% |
37.14% |
3.10% |
3.10% |
13 |
91 |
210 |
2730 |
6.19% |
43.33% |
3.33% |
3.33% |
14 |
105 |
210 |
2940 |
6.67% |
50.00% |
3.57% |
3.57% |
15 |
120 |
210 |
3150 |
7.14% |
57.14% |
3.81% |
3.81% |
16 |
136 |
210 |
3360 |
7.62% |
64.76% |
4.05% |
4.05% |
17 |
153 |
210 |
3570 |
8.10% |
72.86% |
4.29% |
4.29% |
18 |
171 |
210 |
3780 |
8.57% |
81.43% |
4.52% |
4.52% |
19 |
190 |
210 |
3990 |
9.05% |
90.48% |
4.76% |
4.76% |
20 |
210 |
210 |
4200 |
9.52% |
100.00% |
5.00% |
5.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example 2: Using 100 as the denominator for all the percentages
to be summed does not yield a valid result. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator |
Numerator (Running Total) |
Denominator |
Denominator (Running Total) |
Percentage |
Running Sum of % |
Running Sum of % divided by the
number of percentages summed |
Running Percentage |
1 |
1 |
100 |
100 |
1.00% |
1.00% |
1.00% |
1.00% |
2 |
3 |
100 |
200 |
2.00% |
3.00% |
1.50% |
1.50% |
3 |
6 |
100 |
300 |
3.00% |
6.00% |
2.00% |
2.00% |
4 |
10 |
100 |
400 |
4.00% |
10.00% |
2.50% |
2.50% |
5 |
15 |
100 |
500 |
5.00% |
15.00% |
3.00% |
3.00% |
6 |
21 |
100 |
600 |
6.00% |
21.00% |
3.50% |
3.50% |
7 |
28 |
100 |
700 |
7.00% |
28.00% |
4.00% |
4.00% |
8 |
36 |
100 |
800 |
8.00% |
36.00% |
4.50% |
4.50% |
9 |
45 |
100 |
900 |
9.00% |
45.00% |
5.00% |
5.00% |
10 |
55 |
100 |
1000 |
10.00% |
55.00% |
5.50% |
5.50% |
11 |
66 |
100 |
1100 |
11.00% |
66.00% |
6.00% |
6.00% |
12 |
78 |
100 |
1200 |
12.00% |
78.00% |
6.50% |
6.50% |
13 |
91 |
100 |
1300 |
13.00% |
91.00% |
7.00% |
7.00% |
14 |
105 |
100 |
1400 |
14.00% |
105.00% |
7.50% |
7.50% |
15 |
120 |
100 |
1500 |
15.00% |
120.00% |
8.00% |
8.00% |
16 |
136 |
100 |
1600 |
16.00% |
136.00% |
8.50% |
8.50% |
17 |
153 |
100 |
1700 |
17.00% |
153.00% |
9.00% |
9.00% |
18 |
171 |
100 |
1800 |
18.00% |
171.00% |
9.50% |
9.50% |
19 |
190 |
100 |
1900 |
19.00% |
190.00% |
10.00% |
10.00% |
20 |
210 |
100 |
2000 |
20.00% |
210.00% |
10.50% |
10.50% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example 3: summing percentages calculated with different
denominators does not yield meaningful data. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator |
Numerator (Running Total) |
Denominator |
Denominator (Running Total) |
Percentage |
Running Sum of % |
Running Sum of % divided by the
number of percentages summed |
Running Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
10 |
10 |
10.00% |
10.00% |
10.00% |
10.00% |
2 |
3 |
25 |
35 |
8.00% |
18.00% |
9.00% |
8.57% |
3 |
6 |
12 |
47 |
25.00% |
43.00% |
14.33% |
12.77% |
4 |
10 |
15 |
62 |
26.67% |
69.67% |
17.42% |
16.13% |
5 |
15 |
17 |
79 |
29.41% |
99.08% |
19.82% |
18.99% |
6 |
21 |
88 |
167 |
6.82% |
105.90% |
17.65% |
12.57% |
7 |
28 |
398 |
565 |
1.76% |
107.66% |
15.38% |
4.96% |
8 |
36 |
49 |
614 |
16.33% |
123.98% |
15.50% |
5.86% |
9 |
45 |
50 |
664 |
18.00% |
141.98% |
15.78% |
6.78% |
10 |
55 |
66 |
730 |
15.15% |
157.13% |
15.71% |
7.53% |
11 |
66 |
5 |
735 |
220.00% |
377.13% |
34.28% |
8.98% |
12 |
78 |
75 |
810 |
16.00% |
393.13% |
32.76% |
9.63% |
13 |
91 |
49 |
859 |
26.53% |
419.66% |
32.28% |
10.59% |
14 |
105 |
30 |
889 |
46.67% |
466.33% |
33.31% |
11.81% |
15 |
120 |
31 |
920 |
48.39% |
514.72% |
34.31% |
13.04% |
16 |
136 |
32 |
952 |
50.00% |
564.72% |
35.29% |
14.29% |
17 |
153 |
33 |
985 |
51.52% |
616.23% |
36.25% |
15.53% |
18 |
171 |
34 |
1019 |
52.94% |
669.17% |
37.18% |
16.78% |
19 |
190 |
35 |
1054 |
54.29% |
723.46% |
38.08% |
18.03% |
20 |
210 |
36 |
1090 |
55.56% |
779.02% |
38.95% |
19.27% |
No comments:
Post a Comment